|
| |
Ogallala Aquifer
A. GENERAL GEOLOGY, STRATIGRAPHY, AND HYDROLOGY
The Ogallala Formation in Texas is the southernmost extension of the major
water-bearing unit underlying the physiographic province of North America. It
was named by Darton (1898) for the town of Ogallala, Nebraska, near the type
locality.
Following the Laramide revolution in which the southern Rocky Mountains were
uplifted and the Cretaceous seas retreated, rivers flowing east and
southeastward cut valleys into the pre-Ogallala surface. The deposition of the
Ogallala Formation began in late Miocene to early Pliocene age and continued
until late Pliocene time when the climate became more arid and up-warping of the
High Plains area caused deposition to cease and erosion to begin. During
Pliocene time, large quantities of eroded material from the Rocky Mountain
region were transported by wind and water southeastward and deposited on the
then existing surface of primarily Triassic and Permian age rocks. In certain
areas, the depositional surface was composed of Cretaceous and Jurassic age
sediments. The low valley areas were usually filled first by coarser materials
such as gravels and coarse sand. As the valleys and basins filled, sediments
overflowed to form coalescing aprons fed by braided streams that spread across a
generally level plain. Eventually, the entire area was covered by Ogallala
sediments until a maximum thickness of almost 900 feet (274 m) was attained in
southwestern Ochiltree County (Muller and Price, 1979; Bell and Morrison, 1978).
Throughout the time when the Ogallala sediments were being deposited, the
Southern Rocky Mountains remained tectonically active, providing source material
for the Ogallala Formation (Knowles and others 1984).
The Ogallala Formation unconformably overlies Permian, Triassic, Jurassic,
and Cretaceous strata and consists primarily of heterogeneous sequences of
coarse-grained sand and gravel in the lower part grading upward into fine clay,
silt, and sand. Gravel commonly occurs in layers in the basal section and ranges
in size from boulders to pea size. In places, the Ogallala Formation contains
some quartz gravel and caliche with pebbles and cobbles of quartz, quartzite,
and chert being common. In the Northern High Plains the formation has been
divided into three subdivisions: the Valentine, Ash Hollow, and Kimball, based
on fossil vertebrates and flora. The subdivisions, often referred to as floral
zones, are less distinguishable in the Southern High Plains.
The sands are generally tan, yellow, or reddish brown, medium to
coarse-grained, moderately to well sorted, unconsolidated quartz grains,
interbedded with thin layers of clay and occasionally sandstone. The sand is
generally poorly consolidated to unconsolidated, although local cementation by
calcium carbonate and silica occurs. Grain size and condition of sorting is an
indication of the high energy involved in the depositional process of these
sediments. As expected, sand grain and gravel size decreases and sorting
improves eastward.
The gravel is usually associated with sand, silt, and clay and is
occasionally cemented. Quartzite is generally the predominant rock type in the
gravel, although a high percentage of limestone boulders and cobbles occur in
the southern area along with weathered Cretaceous invertebrate fossils. The
occurrence of limestone gravel and Cretaceous fossils indicate that a local
source possibly contributed to the Ogallala sediments in the southern third of
the area.
Near the surface of much of the Texas High Plains are layers of resistant
caliche known as "caprock". Caliche occurs in both Ogallala and
post-Ogallala sediments and is formed by the leaching of carbonate and silica
from surface soils and the re-deposition of the dissolved mineral layers below
the surface. Although caliche layers occur primarily near the surface, deeper
zones of caliche are also present. These deeper layers represent older soil
horizons. The caliche ranges from crumbly to very hard and is almost impermeable
although secondary porosity has been observed in many samples.
Previously, the Ogallala was described as fluvial sediments deposited as a
series of coalescing alluvial fans or plains with only minor amounts of eolian
sediments (Seni, 1980). However, Reeves (1972), Hawley and others (1976), and
Hawley (1984) recognize the Ogallala as predominately eolian sediments in parts
of Texas and southeastern New Mexico. Outcrop and core studies by Gustavson and
Winkler (1987) indicate the Ogallala in Texas and New Mexico consists of
alluvial sediments that partly fill paleovalleys and widespread thick eolian
sediments capping paleo-uplands and most fluvial sections. Calcic paleo-soils
and fossil evidence suggest a depositional environment in a mostly semiarid to
sub-humid climate (Winkler, 1990; Scholiast 1990; and Thomasson, 1990).
Water-bearing areas of the Ogallala Formation are hydraulically connected
except where the Canadian River has partially or totally eroded through the
formation to separate the North and South Plains. Water-bearing units of
Cretaceous and Jurassic ages combine to form the Rita Blanca aquifer in the
western part of Dallam and Hartley counties (Christian, 1983). Lower Cretaceous
units form two separate subcrops within the Texas High Plains, the
Edwards-Trinity (High Plains) and the Edwards-Trinity (Plateau). Underlying
these three aquifers and much of the Ogallala are Triassic (Dockum aquifer) and
Permian formations.
Thickness of the Ogallala Formation is primarily controlled by the morphology
of the eroded pre-Ogallala surface. The greatest thickness occurs where
sediments have filled previously eroded drainage channels. These channels
generally trend east or southeast. Other areas of large Ogallala thickness occur
in the northeast quadrant of the Texas High Plains where sediments have filled
collapsed basins formed by dissolution of Permian evaporites.
The saturated thickness of the Ogallala Formation ranges from a few feet to
more than 525 feet (160 m). In general, the areas of greatest saturated
thickness occur in the North Plains. In the South Plains, between Lubbock and
Midland, the saturated zone varies from less than 50 feet (15 m) to 200 feet (61
m). Depth to water below the land surface can range from almost 400 feet (122 m)
in parts of the North Plains to between 100 to 200 feet (30 to 61 m) throughout
much of the South Plains.
Ogallala groundwater is generally fresh, containing between 300 and 1,000
milligrams per liter (mg/l) of dissolved solids of which calcium, magnesium, and
bicarbonate are the principal constituents. Some hydraulic continuity occurs
between the Ogallala Formation and the underlying Cretaceous, Triassic, and
Permian formations in many areas of the High Plains. For the purposes of this
document, the Ogallala Aquifer will be considered to consist of the saturated
sediments of the Ogallala Formation and any underlying, potable water-bearing
units hydraulically connected with it.
Post-Ogallala Depositions
Post-Ogallala sediments consist of windblown sand and silt, alluvium, and
playa lake deposits. Windblown sands occupy the largest surface area of the High
Plains of Texas and are of both Pleistocene and Recent (Holocene) age. They are
primarily fine-grained to silty, sometimes calcareous, and are derived from
lacustrine, fluvial, and eolian deposits. These sands and soils form sheet or
cover sand, dunes, and dune ridges with thicknesses generally ranging from 0 to
10 feet (0 to 3 m).
Alluvium is present as fluvial flood plain and terraced sediments along the
more active streams and rivers. The deposits consist of poorly sorted, often
cross-bedded, gravel sand, and silt.
Lacustrine deposits, consisting primarily of clay and silt, line the bottom
of the many playa lakes on the High Plains. The sediments are virtually
impermeable, thus restricting natural recharge to the underlying formation.
(Selected references are included in in the back of the Management Plan)
B. Current Volume in Storage.
The saturated
thickness of the Ogallala Aquifer in the District ranges from 10 feet to over
460 feet with an estimated District average of 180 feet. The depth from land
surface to the base of the aquifer can range from the land surface to as much as
1000 feet below surface. The depth to static water level from land surface can
range from the land surface to in excess of 500 feet. Based on saturated
thickness mapping and groundwater production reporting in 2006, the District
estimates the usable quantity of groundwater within the District was in excess
of 133 million acre-feet in 2006.
The year 2000 volume in
storage is taken from Table-1 of the TWDB document “GAM Run 07-19”. A GAM is a
Groundwater Availability Model. The goal of a GAM is to develop a realistic and
scientifically accurate computer model that represents the aquifer, its water
budget, and its groundwater processes such as recharge, discharge, and pumping.
The TWDB data includes all of Dallam, Hartley, Hutchinson and Moore counties.
However, only portions of these counties are located within the District.
Therefore, in computing the total water stored in the Ogallala aquifer in the
District, the TWDB data for each of these counties is prorated based upon the
percentage of each county within the District.
|
County |
2000 |
2010 |
2020 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
2060 |
|
Dallam |
12,962,203 |
10,766,857 |
8,934,892 |
7,455,811 |
6,325,891 |
5,558,599 |
4,991,881 |
|
Hansford |
21,693,703 |
20,385,024 |
19,092,753 |
17,850,094 |
16,716,209 |
15,729,410 |
14,852,445 |
|
Hartley |
21,211,197 |
18,841,781 |
16,690,588 |
14,995,126 |
13,927,855 |
13,250,623 |
12,793,702 |
|
Hutchinson |
3,250,268 |
3,005,580 |
2,768,124 |
2,555,425 |
2,373,250 |
2,231,766 |
2,119,199 |
|
Lipscomb |
18,640,279 |
18,526,166 |
18,413,261 |
18,305,998 |
18,210,229 |
18,128,137 |
18,055,287 |
|
Moore
|
7,387,985 |
6,143,441 |
4,930,678 |
3,860,862 |
3,044,639 |
2,461,010 |
2,028,968 |
|
Ochiltree |
19,795,557 |
18,847,872 |
17,955,425 |
17,118,070 |
16,368,979 |
15,724,576 |
15,156,476 |
|
Sherman |
19,498,315 |
16,814,464 |
14,188,402 |
11,708,499 |
9,545,592 |
7,794,612 |
6,390,606 |
|
TOTAL |
124,439,507 |
113,331,185 |
102,974,123 |
93,849,885 |
86,512,644 |
80,878,733 |
76,388,564 |
The
table below represents total water in storage in the Dockum aquifer in the
District (storage volumes were adjusted based on TWDB data by applying a
prorata distribution to Dallam, Hartley, and Moore Counties.)
|
County |
Total Volume in County |
Total Volume in District |
|
Dallam |
6,561,800 |
4,772,397 |
|
Hartley |
6,374,320 |
5,424,546 |
|
Moore |
7,387,985 |
5,119,135 |
|
TOTAL |
20,324,105 |
15,316,078 |
Source: TWDB Report 359, December 2003
The production reported to the District by users for the
year 2006 was used to estimate usage for each year since 2000 to calculate a
current volume in storage. The current volume in storage for the District is
estimated to be 133,558,000 acre-feet.
C. Estimated Annual Groundwater Use
(31 TAC
§356.5(a)(5)(B), §36.1071(e)(3)(B)).
In
2006, the District’s annual reported groundwater use was 1,198,700 acre-feet (NPGCD
Permit Database, 2007). The reported annual water used does not reflect wells
that are incapable of producing more than 25,000 gallons of groundwater a
day. The District anticipates most of these small
wells in the District are used for livestock. The TWDB’s most recent estimate
for annual livestock use in the eight-county area was 22,635 acre-feet in 2003.
Total reported and estimated annual water use within the District for 2006 was
1,221,335 acre-feet. Annual groundwater use is not expected to change
significantly over the next five years.
|
County |
Reported Water Use1 |
TWDB Estimated
Livestock Use2 |
|
Dallam |
275,066 |
3,235 |
|
Hansford |
112,145 |
3,700 |
|
Hartley |
303,838 |
3,835 |
|
Hutchinson |
37,380 |
437 |
|
Lipscomb |
28,513 |
844 |
|
Moore
|
155,819 |
4,591 |
|
Ochiltree |
65,916 |
2,554 |
|
Sherman |
220,024 |
3,434 |
|
Total |
1,198,701 |
22,630 |
Source: 1. NPGCD Permit
Database, 2007 and 2. TWDB estimated historical use
(2003).
Based on the number and size of new wells in the District and the District’s
2006 reported groundwater use, the District’s five-year estimated pumping trend
in total groundwater use in acre-feet is shown below.
|
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
|
1,186,757 |
1,189,732 |
1,192,713 |
1,195,703 |
1,198,700 |
|